● English Premier League · 35เตะ 2 May 2026, 02:00

Leeds United พบ Burnley พรีวิวและสกอร์ที่คาด

สร้างคำทำนายเมื่อ1 May 2026, 00:35อัปเดต9 May 2026, 03:00ตรวจผลเมื่อ9 May 2026, 12:00โมเดล3/3✓ ทายถูก
เจ้าบ้าน · #14/20
จบเกม
3 - 1
ผลคาดการณ์: LEEDS WIN
3/3 ตลาดที่ถูก
ทีมเยือน · #19/20
● ความเห็นพ้อง AI
2/3เห็นว่า Leeds United ชนะ
Leeds United ชนะ67% · GPT · Gemini
● เห็นต่าง (Kimi)33%

โมเดล AI ทั้ง 3 ว่าอย่างไร

เปรียบเทียบคำทำนายของแต่ละโมเดลพร้อมระดับความมั่นใจ ก่อนอ่านเหตุผลโดยละเอียดด้านล่าง

✓
GPT
LEEDS WIN
มั่นใจ 75%
✓
Gemini
LEEDS WIN
มั่นใจ 75%
✗
Kimi
ผลเสมอ
มั่นใจ 60%

ผลงานล่าสุด

5 นัดล่าสุดของแต่ละทีม จากข้อมูลที่ AI ใช้พิจารณา

Leeds United8/15 แต้ม
  • 27 Apr 2026@Chelsea0-1L
  • 23 Apr 2026@AFC Bournemouth2-2D
  • 19 Apr 2026vsWolves3-0W
  • 14 Apr 2026@Manchester United2-1W
  • 6 Apr 2026@West Ham United2-2D
Burnley1/15 แต้ม
  • 23 Apr 2026vsManchester City0-1L
  • 20 Apr 2026@Nottingham Forest1-4L
  • 12 Apr 2026vsBrighton Hove Albion0-2L
  • 22 Mar 2026@Fulham1-3L
  • 15 Mar 2026vsAFC Bournemouth0-0D

สรุปเหตุผลของ AI

Model Agreement Summary

The prediction suite shows a clear split. Two of three models (GPT and Gemini) are firmly aligned on a Leeds United home win, a handicap cover of -1.5, and an over 2.75 goals outcome. The third model (Kimi) takes a contrarian stance, calling for a draw, Burnley +1.5 cover, and under 2.75 goals, primarily arguing that the market is overreacting to Leeds’ recent results and overlooking fixture fatigue and Burnley’s ability to frustrate.

Key Factors

  • Form disparity is stark. Leeds’ last three Premier League outings have produced 7 goals scored and 3 conceded, including a dominant 3-0 home win over Wolves. Burnley, by contrast, have lost four straight league matches with an aggregate score of 2-10, conceding at least twice in three of those defeats. This raw performance gap makes it difficult to see how Burnley can avoid defeat, let alone keep the match tight.
  • Tactical mismatch. Leeds’ 3-4-2-1 overloads the half-spaces where Burnley’s wide center-backs are most vulnerable. The presence of Brenden Aaronson and Noah Okafor as dual 10s, combined with Dominic Calvert-Lewin’s aerial threat, creates high-probability scoring chances against a defense that has repeatedly struggled against crosses.
  • Market signals are mixed but not mispriced. The -1.5 handicap is priced at even money (1.000) with Burnley +1.5 at 0.850, implying a roughly 50-50 split on a two-goal margin. While that suggests caution, it does not indicate a clear value play – rather, it reflects a balanced assessment of Leeds’ ability to win comfortably against a poor side. The O/U 2.75 line is shaded towards over (0.830), which aligns with the goal expectations from both teams’ recent matches.
  • Fixture fatigue is a valid but overplayed concern. Leeds played an FA Cup tie five days earlier, but they are at home against the league’s worst-form side, and Burnley’s own midweek recovery is no better. The depth in Leeds’ attack suggests they can still impose themselves.

Where Models Disagree

Kimi’s argument hinges on value in the draw (5.00) and the under-goals market, pointing to Burnley’s 0-0 vs Bournemouth and a narrow loss to Man City as evidence of a low-block resilience. However, those performances were both at home. Burnley’s away record is catastrophic: 10 goals conceded in the last four road matches, with no sign of structural solidity. The claim that Leeds’ 1.330 price implies an inflated 75% win probability may be true, but the actual win probability based on form and quality is likely even higher, making the home bet still a solid consensus pick. For the handicap, the majority view that Leeds -1.5 covers is backed by Burnley’s recurring 2+ goal defeats away from home. The over 2.75 selection similarly profits from Leeds’ scoring consistency and Burnley’s defensive leaks; an under outcome would require Burnley to both keep the score low and avoid a multi-goal loss, a combination that has occurred only once in their last five outings.

Final Consensus Verdict

We side with the majority. The weight of evidence – form, tactical setup, and head-to-head situation – strongly supports a Leeds victory. Handicap cover and over 2.75 goals are taken with medium confidence, acknowledging that a single-goal margin or a controlled 2-0 scoreline are possible, but Burnley’s defensive fragility tilts the balance toward a more comfortable home win. The contrarian draw and under calls are respected as value plays, but they do not reflect the most probable outcome given the current data.

เหตุผลโดยละเอียดจากแต่ละโมเดล

คำตอบเต็มจากแต่ละ AI ที่อธิบายเส้นทางความคิด เริ่มจากเสียงข้างมาก ตามด้วยความเห็นต่าง

GPT
ทำนาย: Leeds United ชนะ
มั่นใจ 75%

Form and goal profile

Leeds United are the statistical pick on the 1x2. Across their last five matches, Leeds have scored 9 and conceded 6, which is 1.8 goals scored per match vs 1.2 conceded. Burnley’s same-window profile is much weaker: 2 scored and 10 conceded, or 0.4 goals scored per match vs 2.0 conceded. The gap is even clearer in league form: Leeds’ last three Premier League matches produced 7 goals for and 3 against, while Burnley have lost four straight league games by an aggregate 2-10.

Home/away comparison

The sample is limited, but the directional evidence is strong. Leeds’ most recent home league match was a 3-0 win over Wolves, while Burnley’s last two away matches were 4-1 at Nottingham Forest and 3-1 at Fulham. That gives a direct numerical comparison of Leeds recent home: 3.0 goals/match vs Burnley recent away conceded: 3.5 goals/match. Burnley have conceded at least two goals in three of their last four defeats, which supports Leeds not only winning but having a realistic path to covering -1.5.

Player output

Leeds have more distributed attacking production. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 8 goals in 31 apps, Noah Okafor has 7 goals in 27 apps, and Brenden Aaronson adds 4 goals and 5 assists in 33 apps. Burnley do have threats through Zian Flemming and Jaidon Anthony, both on 7 goals, but the team’s recent attacking output has collapsed: only 2 goals in five matches, including three blanks.

Market call

  • 1x2: Leeds’ stronger scoring rate and Burnley’s defensive trend make home the clear pick.
  • Handicap -1.5: Burnley’s recent away defeats by 2+ goals make Leeds cover attractive, though not high confidence because Leeds have drawn two of the last five.
  • Over 2.75: Burnley’s away defensive numbers and Leeds’ recent league scoring point toward a 3-goal game or better, with 3-0 or 3-1 fitting the data.
ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Form and goal profile Leeds United are the statistical pick on the 1x2 .
  • Across their last five matches, Leeds have scored 9 and conceded 6, which is 1.8 goals scored per match vs 1.2 conceded .
  • Burnley’s same-window profile is much weaker: 2 scored and 10 conceded, or 0.4 goals scored per match vs 2.0 conceded .
  • The gap is even clearer in league form: Leeds’ last three Premier League matches produced 7 goals for and 3 against, while Burnley have lost four straight league games by an aggregate 2-10.
Gemini
ทำนาย: Leeds United ชนะ
มั่นใจ 75%

Tactical Matchup: Width vs. Wing-Back Vulnerability

Leeds United’s 3-4-2-1 formation is designed to create numerical overloads in the half-spaces, a tactical setup that Burnley’s 3-4-3 has historically struggled to contain. With Brenden Aaronson and Noah Okafor operating as dual number 10s, they will occupy the pockets between Burnley’s wing-backs and their outside center-backs. Burnley’s defensive structure often leaves their back three exposed when their wing-backs are forced to track Leeds' high-flying wing-backs, James Justin and potentially Junior Firpo. This creates a 'chess' advantage where Leeds can isolate Burnley’s slower center-backs in 1v1 situations.

The Calvert-Lewin Factor

A concrete tactical edge for Leeds is the aerial dominance of Dominic Calvert-Lewin. Burnley’s recent defensive performances, particularly the 4-1 loss to Nottingham Forest, highlighted a significant weakness in defending crosses and second-phase set pieces. Leeds ranks highly in progressive crosses, and with Anton Stach providing late runs from midfield to distract the markers, Calvert-Lewin is likely to find high-quality chances against a Burnley backline that lacks the recovery speed to deal with Leeds' quick transitions.

Momentum and Defensive Fragility

Burnley’s recent form is concerning; they have conceded 10 goals in their last four matches, showing a lack of cohesion when pressed high. Leeds, under their current system, utilizes a high-intensity press that will force Burnley’s ball-playing defenders into errors. While Burnley has goal threats in Jaidon Anthony, they lack the midfield control (evidenced by Josh Cullen’s low rating/limited apps) to sustain pressure. Leeds’ victory over Manchester United and a dominant 3-0 win over Wolves suggest they are peaking at the right time to cover the -1.5 handicap against a side that is struggling to stay competitive away from home.

ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Tactical Matchup: Width vs.
  • Wing-Back Vulnerability Leeds United’s 3-4-2-1 formation is designed to create numerical overloads in the half-spaces, a tactical setup that Burnley’s 3-4-3 has historically struggled to contain.
  • With Brenden Aaronson and Noah Okafor operating as dual number 10s, they will occupy the pockets between Burnley’s wing-backs and their outside center-backs.
  • Burnley’s defensive structure often leaves their back three exposed when their wing-backs are forced to track Leeds' high-flying wing-backs, James Justin and potentially Junior Firpo .
Kimi
ทำนาย: ผลเสมอ
มั่นใจ 60%

Market Sentiment & 1x2 Mispricing

The 1x2 market is treating Leeds United as a near-lock at 1.330, implying a hefty 75.2% win probability. The draw is offered at 5.000 (~20% implied) and Burnley at 9.000 (~11.1%). This is a textbook public overreaction. Leeds have generated buzz after beating Manchester United and Wolves, but they have also drawn two of their last five and are coming off an emotionally draining FA Cup semi-final loss to Chelsea with minimal recovery time. Burnley, meanwhile, are desperate for survival points and have shown they can frustrate opponents, evidenced by their 0-0 shutout of Bournemouth and a narrow 0-1 loss to Manchester City. At 5.000, the draw offers fat value because the true probability of a stalemate is closer to 25% given the likely low-block, low-tempo script.

Handicap Market Divergence

There is a clear disconnect between the outright and handicap markets. Leeds are asked to cover -1.5 at even money (1.000), while Burnley +1.5 is shaded to 0.850. This pricing signals that sharper money is skeptical of a Leeds blowout. Leeds have covered -1.5 in only one of their last five fixtures (the 3-0 vs Wolves), with narrow wins and draws far more common. Burnley’s 3-4-3 formation will likely drop into a deep defensive block at Elland Road, aiming to keep the deficit within one goal. Taking the away side on the handicap aligns with the market’s hidden signal and offers protection against a single-goal Leeds win.

Goal-Line Contrarian Value

The total of 2.75 is heavily skewed toward the over at 0.830, implying the market expects a Leeds goal-fest. We see three compelling reasons to go under:

  • Burnley’s attack is anemic: They have scored just two goals in their last five matches and were held scoreless in three of those.
  • Tempo control: Leeds will dominate possession, but against a deep 3-4-3 block, they will take low-xG shots from distance rather than generate transition chaos.
  • Fixture fatigue: Leeds played a high-intensity FA Cup tie against Chelsea on April 26, leaving them with less than a week to recover for this midweek kickoff.

A controlled 1-0 or 1-1 result is well within reach, making the under at 1.030 the value play. The crowd is chasing goals based on Leeds’ recent 3-0 highlight; we are betting on the reality of a relegation-threatened side parking the bus.

Summary

Fade the favorite. The implied probabilities in the 1x2 market are inflated by recency bias and public support for Leeds. The handicap and goal-line markets both flash warning signs that this will be tighter and lower-scoring than the headline odds suggest. Our positions exploit the gap between perception and probability.

ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Market Sentiment & 1x2 Mispricing The 1x2 market is treating Leeds United as a near-lock at 1.330 , implying a hefty 75.2% win probability.
  • The draw is offered at 5.000 (~20% implied) and Burnley at 9.000 (~11.1%).
  • This is a textbook public overreaction.
  • Burnley, meanwhile, are desperate for survival points and have shown they can frustrate opponents, evidenced by their 0-0 shutout of Bournemouth and a narrow 0-1 loss to Manchester City.

ผู้เล่นที่น่าจับตา

สถิติฤดูกาลของผู้เล่นที่น่าจะมีผลต่อเกม

Leeds United

Dominic Calvert-Lewin
G8A1RTG105.9
Noah Okafor
G7A1RTG90.72
Lukas Nmecha
G4A1RTG85.65
Brenden Aaronson
G4A5RTG110.37
Anton Stach
G4A3RTG93.5
Joe Rodon
G2A0RTG102.74
James Justin
G2A1RTG84.15
Sean Longstaff
G2A2RTG66.65

Burnley

Zian Flemming
G7A0RTG82.64
Jaidon Anthony
G7A1RTG108.53
Lyle Foster
G3A2RTG78.35
Chimuanya Ugochukwu
G3A1RTG101.4
Josh Cullen
G2A2RTG60.08
Axel Tuanzebe
G1A0RTG35.1
Josh Laurent
G1A0RTG93.94
Marcus Edwards
G1A3RTG69.57
เข้ากลุ่มบอลโลก Telegram
ดูบอลสดที่ GoGoalStream