● Italy Serie A · 37เตะ

Pisa พบ Napoli พรีวิวและสกอร์ที่คาด

สร้างคำทำนายเมื่อ17 May 2026, 10:07อัปเดต17 May 2026, 19:00โมเดล3/3◑ ทายถูกบางส่วน
เจ้าบ้าน
จบเกม
0 - 3
ผลคาดการณ์: 0 - 2 · NAPOLI WIN
2/3 ตลาดที่ถูก
ทีมเยือน
● ความเห็นพ้อง AI
2/3เห็นว่า Napoli ชนะ
Napoli ชนะ67% · GPT · Gemini
● เห็นต่าง (Kimi)33%
● ปัจจัยสำคัญ
  • Pisa have lost 5 straight, conceding 11 goals and scoring just 2 in that run.
  • Napoli's McTominay (9G) and Hojlund (9G) provide far greater goal threat than Pisa's top scorer Moreo (4G).
  • Napoli's recent away matches have been low-scoring (0-0 at Como, 1-1 at Parma), supporting an under.
  • The reverse fixture ended 3-2, but Pisa's current attacking form is much colder, making a repeat high-scoring game unlikely.
  • Market odds heavily favor Napoli (1.36) and the -1.25 handicap, aligning with the consensus away win.

โมเดล AI ทั้ง 3 ว่าอย่างไร

เปรียบเทียบคำทำนายของแต่ละโมเดลพร้อมระดับความมั่นใจ ก่อนอ่านเหตุผลโดยละเอียดด้านล่าง

✓
GPT
NAPOLI WIN
0 - 2
มั่นใจ 75%
✓
Gemini
NAPOLI WIN
0 - 3
มั่นใจ 75%
✗
Kimi
ผลเสมอ
1 - 1
มั่นใจ 60%

ผลงานล่าสุด

5 นัดล่าสุดของแต่ละทีม จากข้อมูลที่ AI ใช้พิจารณา

Pisa0/15 แต้ม
  • 11 May 2026@Cremonese0-3L
  • 2 May 2026vsLecce1-2L
  • 26 Apr 2026@Parma0-1L
  • 20 Apr 2026vsGenoa1-2L
  • 11 Apr 2026@AS Roma0-3L
Napoli5/15 แต้ม
  • 12 May 2026vsBologna2-3L
  • 3 May 2026@Como0-0D
  • 25 Apr 2026vsCremonese4-0W
  • 19 Apr 2026vsLazio0-2L
  • 13 Apr 2026@Parma1-1D

สรุปเหตุผลของ AI

Model Agreement Summary

Two of the three models (GPT and Gemini) strongly back an away win for Napoli, both with high confidence. They agree on the handicap direction (Napoli -1.25) with medium confidence. The main split is on the total goals: GPT and Kimi predict under 2.75, while Gemini goes over. The predicted scorelines vary, but the consensus away win points to a controlled Napoli victory, likely with a clean sheet.

Key Factors

The overwhelming factor is Pisa's catastrophic form: five consecutive defeats, with only two goals scored and eleven conceded. Their home matches have been 1-2 losses to Lecce and Genoa, showing a consistent inability to keep opponents out. Napoli, despite recent inconsistency, possess far superior individual quality. Scott McTominay (9 goals, 3 assists) and Rasmus Hojlund (9 goals, 4 assists) are reliable finishers, while Pisa's top scorer Stefano Moreo has just 4 goals all season. Napoli's midfield engine, with Anguissa and McTominay, should dominate a Pisa side that has been overrun in transition. The reverse fixture (Napoli 3-2) demonstrated Napoli's ability to create chances, but Pisa's current attacking output is so poor that a repeat high-scoring affair is improbable. Napoli's recent away games have been tight: 0-0 at Como and 1-1 at Parma, suggesting they can control matches without needing to score heavily. This supports the under 2.75 call, as a 0-2 or 0-1 result is more likely than an open game.

Where Models Disagree

The primary disagreement comes from Kimi, which argues that the market is overpricing Napoli and that a draw offers value. Kimi points to Napoli's poor recent form (one win in five) and their struggles to score away from home. However, this view underestimates the gulf in class and the psychological state of Pisa. Pisa are in freefall, lacking any offensive threat to trouble Napoli's defense. While Napoli have been inconsistent, they are facing the league's worst-form side, and the motivation to bounce back from a home loss to Bologna is high. Gemini's over 2.75 pick is based on Napoli's attacking width and Pisa's defensive vulnerabilities, but it overlooks Napoli's recent away scoring drought. The consensus sides with the under, as the data from Napoli's last two road trips (0 and 1 goal scored) strongly suggests a low-scoring pattern.

Final Consensus Verdict

Weighing all evidence, the consensus is a Napoli away win with high confidence. The -1.25 Asian handicap is achievable but carries medium confidence due to Napoli's occasional flat performances; a 2-goal margin is plausible but not guaranteed. The total goals are expected to stay under 2.75, as both teams' recent trends point to a tight, controlled match. The most likely scoreline is 0-2, reflecting Napoli's superiority and Pisa's attacking impotence. This outcome aligns with the majority model view and the underlying statistical profiles of both sides.

เหตุผลโดยละเอียดจากแต่ละโมเดล

คำตอบเต็มจากแต่ละ AI ที่อธิบายเส้นทางความคิด เริ่มจากเสียงข้างมาก ตามด้วยความเห็นต่าง

GPT
ทำนาย: Napoli ชนะ
มั่นใจ 75%

Form and goal profile

The statistical gap is clear enough to support an away win. Pisa have lost all of their last 5 Serie A matches, scoring only 2 goals and conceding 11. That is Pisa: 0.4 goals scored/match and 2.2 conceded/match. Napoli are not in perfect form, but their last 5 show 7 scored and 6 conceded, or Napoli: 1.4 goals scored/match and 1.2 conceded/match. Even with Napoli’s recent inconsistency, Pisa’s defensive trend is much weaker.

Home and away read

Pisa’s two most recent home matches were both 1-2 defeats, against Lecce and Genoa, so they are allowing repeat scoring chances even at home. Napoli’s recent away results are more conservative: 0-0 at Como and 1-1 at Parma. That lowers the total-goals expectation and is the main reason the pick leans under 2.75 rather than chasing a high-scoring Napoli win. A 0-2 result fits both patterns: Pisa fail to produce enough, while Napoli control the match without needing an open game.

Players and head-to-head

Napoli also have the superior individual output. Scott Mctominay has 9G 3A in 31 apps and Rasmus Hojlund has 9G 4A in 31 apps, giving Napoli two reliable goal sources. Pisa’s top scorer Stefano Moreo has only 4G 1A in 35 apps, while the next listed contributors are far lower-volume scorers. The September head-to-head ended Napoli 3-2 Pisa, again showing Napoli’s ability to create against this opponent. However, Pisa’s current attack is cold, so the cleaner statistical call is Napoli to win and cover -1.25, with the total staying just below 2.75.

  • Pisa’s five-match form is 0 wins, 0 draws, 5 losses.
  • Napoli have the stronger scoring depth and higher season production.
  • The most likely scoreline is a controlled 0-2 away win.
ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Pisa lost 5 straight with only 0.4 goals per match
  • Napoli have far stronger season scorers in Mctominay and Hojlund
  • Napoli away totals have stayed low in recent road matches
Gemini
ทำนาย: Napoli ชนะ
มั่นใจ 75%

Tactical Breakdown: Midfield Overrun

The tactical disparity in this matchup is centered in the central third. Napoli utilizes a dynamic midfield engine featuring Scott McTominay and Andre Zambo Anguissa, who provide both late-arriving goal threats and physical dominance. Pisa typically operates with a conservative structure, but their recent form (5 consecutive losses) suggests a total breakdown in defensive transitions. Against a Napoli side that excels at verticality, Pisa's aging backline, led by Caracciolo, will struggle to track the off-the-ball runs of Rasmus Hojlund and the creative drifting of David Neres.

The Width Advantage

Pisa has shown a specific vulnerability to wing-backs and inverted wingers, as evidenced by their recent 3-0 losses to Cremonese and Roma. Leonardo Spinazzola and Matteo Politano provide the width necessary to stretch Pisa's narrow defensive shape. By pulling Pisa's wing-backs out of position, Napoli creates 'half-spaces' for McTominay to exploit. Pisa’s lack of a prolific goalscorer (top scorer Moreo has only 4 goals) means they lack the 'out-ball' necessary to relieve pressure, leading to a game played almost entirely in their defensive half.

Psychological and Form Factors

Napoli is coming off a frustrating 2-3 loss to Bologna and will be highly motivated to rectify their defensive lapses. Pisa is in a freefall, failing to score in three of their last five matches while conceding multiple goals in four of them. The -1.25 Asian Handicap is well within reach for a Napoli side that recently put four past Cremonese. Given Pisa's inability to contain high-caliber attacks and Napoli's need for a statement win, a comfortable away victory with a clean sheet is the most probable outcome.

ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Pisa's 5-match losing streak with 11 goals conceded
  • Napoli's physical midfield dominance (McTominay/Anguissa)
  • Tactical mismatch: Pisa's low block vs Napoli's elite creative depth
Kimi
ทำนาย: ผลเสมอ
มั่นใจ 60%

Market Mispricing on the Favorite

The 1x2 market is treating Napoli like a juggernaut, pricing them at 1.36 (implied 73.5% win probability) and leaving the draw at 4.75 (implied 21.1%). That is a colossal overstatement. Napoli have won just one of their last five matches, drawing away to relegation-battlers Como and Parma in that sequence. Their attack has misfired in three of those five games, scoring zero against Como and Lazio. Meanwhile, Pisa are desperate at home and have lost by only a single goal in their last two home fixtures. The market is clearly pricing reputation over current form, creating fat value on the draw and on Pisa on the handicap.

Handicap Value with the Home Side

The Asian Handicap line of -1.25 on Napoli assumes they will cruise to a multi-goal victory. There is no evidence for that. Napoli have not won by two clear goals on the road in this recent stretch, and the reverse fixture ended 3-2, a one-goal margin. Pisa +1.25 offers a safety net: even a narrow Napoli win returns at least half the stake, while a draw or shock result wins fully. Given Napoli's flat performances and Pisa's need to avoid a sixth straight defeat, the home side is the clear value play.

Goal Expectation and Total

The total of 2.75 is inflated by the 3-2 reverse fixture and Pisa's recent games landing on three goals. However, Napoli's offensive output has dried up in away games, and Pisa's leading scorer has just four goals on the season. A cagey, low-chance match is far more likely than the market assumes. With motivation favoring a tight contest, the under is the contrarian call.

Predicted Scoreline

All signs point to a stalemate. Napoli possess superior individual quality but lack the urgency or rhythm to break down a resolute home side. A 1-1 draw satisfies the draw pick, keeps Pisa +1.25 safely in profit, and lands two goals under the 2.75 threshold.

ปัจจัยหลัก
  • Napoli's late-season apathy: one win in last five, flat away performances at Como and Parma
  • Market overprices Napoli: 1.36 implies 73.5% win probability despite poor recent form
  • Pisa's home resilience: recent narrow 1-2 defeats suggest they can keep this close

ผู้เล่นที่น่าจับตา

สถิติฤดูกาลของผู้เล่นที่น่าจะมีผลต่อเกม

Pisa

Stefano Moreo
G4A1RTG115.13
Antonio Caracciolo
G2A0RTG111.68
Mehdi Leris
G2A3RTG105.59
Henrik Meister
G2A0RTG83.29
Idrissa Toure
G1A0RTG103.68
Michel Aebischer
G1A1RTG107.09
Matteo Tramoni
G1A2RTG87
Player #156942
G1A0RTG51

Napoli

Scott Mctominay
G9A3RTG108.87
Rasmus Hojlund
G9A4RTG104.29
Andre Zambo Anguissa
G4A1RTG61.19
Alisson Santos
G4A0RTG43.73
Leonardo Spinazzola
G3A3RTG101.3
David Neres Campos
G3A3RTG53.9
Kevin De Bruyne
G2A1RTG55.08
Matteo Politano
G2A5RTG110.53
เข้ากลุ่มบอลโลก Telegram
ดูบอลสดที่ GoGoalStream